Overlap output and independent work.
parallel_invocation_batchRECORD STATUSCandidate · v0.1.0The proposed contract drawn as participant roles, received calls, and numbered dependencies.
The same roles and calls as a class collaboration and a numbered message sequence.
Where the mechanism applies. All four dimensions belong to the proposed match, not just its vocabulary.
The obligation that clients, operators, and auditors should be able to rely on.
Generic concurrency in an unrelated subsystem does not count.
The hot spot is admitted only where the protected semantics survive.
Batch size, asyncio or promise scheduler, streaming reducer, and ordering policy.
Test one failure, cancellation, completion order, and concurrent side effects.
Did concurrency expand from tools to agents and preserve correlation?
An illustrative prompt and a small design sketch for the proposed contract. Names and APIs are invented; this is not a repository excerpt.
Dispatch independent invocations concurrently. Give every invocation a stable identity, stream results as they arrive, and do not declare the batch complete until each invocation has a result, a failure, or an explicit cancellation record.async def run_batch(invocations, runtime):
pending = {inv.id: asyncio.create_task(runtime.invoke(inv)) for inv in invocations}
results = {}
for finished in asyncio.as_completed(pending.values()):
result = await finished
results[result.invocation_id] = result
yield result
missing = set(pending) - set(results)
if missing:
raise BatchIncomplete(sorted(missing))Illustrative design sketch. Correlation by invocation id is the contract; concurrency alone is not. This example is a teaching aid, not implementation evidence or a conformance claim.
The frozen rule that retrieves this record, the canonical source exemplar, and the control that should stay unmatched.
parallel_invocation_batch(?i)\b(?:concurrent|parallel(?:ism)?|batch(?:ed|ing)?|Promise\.all|asyncio\.gather)\bFrozen expression, v0.1.0. A match is a retrieval cue, not a confirmed implementation.openhands-sdk/openhands/sdk/agent/parallel_executor.py:51Support: tests/sdk/agent/test_parallel_tool_span_context.py:1Scope-anchored review. pohe-agent analyze <repo> --pattern P02 anchors the cue to its enclosing declaration and checks a separate operational signature for all four pointcut dimensions. Missing roles and negative-control risks remain visible; a structural match is not E2/E3. Calibration report ↗
Up to five public files retrieved by the frozen cue and pinned to the audited commit. A match is a place to inspect, not a confirmed implementation.
openhands-sdk/openhands/sdk/agent/parallel_executor.py:51CANONICAL SOURCE02aaif-goose/goosecrates/goose/src/acp/handoff.rs:113RETRIEVAL CUE03affaan-m/ECCskills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:409RETRIEVAL CUE04agno-agi/agnolibs/agno/agno/db/singlestore/utils.py:217RETRIEVAL CUE05Aider-AI/aideraider/coders/editblock_coder.py:457RETRIEVAL CUEEach layer answers a different question. Do not substitute retrieval for review.
A concrete source anchor is available for this proposed record. It is one exemplar, not evidence that all repositories—or every contract field—conform.
Review boundary: this candidate and its specification come from an AI-assisted study. Independent human validation remains open.
100.0% of repository families in the frozen panel have at least one current cue, historical cue, or canonical source layer. This is not confirmed prevalence.
Current lexical-cue repositories: 40 / 415c524ad65d81openhands-sdk/openhands/sdk/agent/parallel_executor.py:51tests/sdk/agent/test_parallel_tool_span_context.py:1Parallel batch tool executor with asyncio.gather.
(?i)\b(?:concurrent|parallel(?:ism)?|batch(?:ed|ing)?|Promise\.all|asyncio\.gather)\bThis expression is a discovery instrument only. A match is a retrieval cue—not a confirmed implementation, pointcut match, or contract proof.